Plagiarism is the new buzz word in 21st century, which came as a byproduct of growing ubiquity of internet. Information age brought a new dawn in the world where transfer of knowledge has become a cakewalk. But coin always has two faces and similarly information age not only brought the world closer in the form of sharing of resources but also led to change in dynamics and the way people take these reference materials. Boon and bane go hand in hand & plagiarism came as a bane for the same.
Plagiarism refers to copying of another person`s ideas, words or work and pretending that they are your own. Indeed it isn`t wrong to say that in today`s world nothing is your own, with such vast information channels available your idea may resemble that of someone else`s as well. The true problem occurs in determination of what actually can be brought under the ambit of plagiarism. So effectively all plagiarism checkers review ought to be specific in terms of clarity, matter, ideas, language and an analysis needs to ensure what should be permitted and what ought to be omitted.
Reviewer needs to set parameters and give specific importance to each parameter and review needs to effectively showcase on what basis does particular thing comes under plagiarism and to what extent. In case, there is a match of entire text, it is a foregone conclusion that the matter has been copied directly from some source and indeed it is the highest level of plagiarism.
There are chances that someone may copy the matter in their own language. In such cases, plagiarism reviewer ought to carry out a thorough review and understand the main points of the matter. In case all points are seen matching and there is only a slight change in language, this again is a case of plagiarism.
Huge amount of ideas flow through every individual`s neurons. With right to free speech in space, and internet becoming a sure shot partner in realizing this right, dynamism of information sharing has changed and internet has become a space where almost everything and every idea is available. If someone’s idea has a common foundation of someone else’s idea, it cannot be designated as plagiarism. Research work or thesis, in case, being submitted by your own name would definitely be termed as copied.
Also, toleration limit has to be defined. Reviewer ought to understand as things are in common; a certain toleration limit needs to be defined. Even if the work is totally unique i.e. undertaken by you, still a part of it would definitely fetch some citing over internet. Also, the place from where the material is copied is of importance. If it is something from public domain that is free for public viewing, the same should be assigned lower priority, whereas in case something is copied from a source which is a part of some literary work of an individual, the same needs to be viewed with more suspicion.
Although the onus in on the owner to ensure what work needs to be placed on the virtual medium and what not as in today`s world whatever is on internet has unknowingly become public property. Also, in case of research oriented issues, the work should be properly secured in order to prevent it from landing in wrong hands. Still, reviewer`s task has become one of the most important tasks of today. Plagiarism leads to stealing of some part of material that may be result of someone`s years of research. Other way around, with growing spread of matter, reviewer needs to adequately define what is plagiarism and what is the tolerance limit for same.
What is the Main Cause of a Heart Attack? What is its Solution? A heart attack is the blockage of… Read More
In the vast economic arena, one term that often takes center stage, inciting extensive debates and discussions, is the "debt… Read More
De-Dollarization: The Changing Face of Global Finance The financial landscape is in a state of flux, with an intriguing economic… Read More
The curtains closed on a dramatic Bundesliga season with Bayern Munich standing tall once again, clinching their 11th straight title.… Read More
The Unfolding Story of Celine Dion's Health In recent news that has left fans across the globe stunned, iconic singer… Read More
As the echoes of the recent NBA season start to fade, the attention of enthusiasts is firmly glued to one… Read More
View Comments
A common belief about ethical writing is what is wrote by an author, whether it came in the form a manuscript of a magazine, science journal, research paper for an assignment, or a proposal of a grant submitted to an an agency, there is represented a near to implicit contract that is between an author of a publishing and their readers. Accordingly, it is for a reader to assume that the original author is in fact that style of author, also any material, data, and ideas possibly borrowed is identified mostly by established scholar conventions, including footnotes, text that is block-indented, and quotation marks. Usually a reader assumes of a information conveyed about is accurate in the representing and of the authors best abilities. Writing that is ethical is clear, with accuracy, honest, and fair and conveys to those that read, and is found to have commitment of ethical practice in different aspects.
In the classroom, one would be reminded by teachers that mostly it is against University rules to plagiarize and constitutes a sort of academic dishonesty. Even if a professor doesn’t explain it, the Student Handbook is to remind all students in courses at universities to abide within an Honor Statement. If plagiarism occurs it is when words or ideas of someone else are written as one's own. It is when ideas about an event in history from a blog of a professor is taken and a person does not provide credit of those ideas in their history paper. Things such as providing a citation and references for information that could be paraphrased, giving credit to any concepts, a fact or idea that could be found in different sources is advised to keep from accusations of plagiarism. Any instance of inappropriate paraphrasing often is perhaps one of the most common forms of plagiarism and being controversial. The happening occurs when a criteria for constituting of proper paraphrasing is different between some individuals. If the publishing of another is summarized, one has to use their own words to condense while conveying contributions of others that is in a shorter version. There are many times scholar writing and scientific writing involve paraphrasing and summaries of other writing varieties.
As it is true that plagiarism is mostly conceptualized as a theft, the idea of a person to self-plagiarize perhaps would not seem much meaning. After all, it may not be possible for one to steal from oneself. Although, it is mentioned that it could be possible to happen as when a person engages with an embezzlement or fraud of insurance. However, if the term was applied to researches and scholarship, self-plagiarism would refer to authors that reuse previously disseminated original content and state it as as a ”newer” design without letting informing audiences that material may have appeared previously. As the sort described, self-plagiarism may mislead a reader about the substance of any material. There are some common examples regarding self- plagiarism along with guidelines to avoid possible circumstances. There are many journals of biomedical that have certain policies that clarify their opposition of multiple submissions on one same paper. Some journals request that submitted manuscripts of authors for publication to also have included submitted papers that were published previously or ones currently under a review that have a related topic of a manuscript to be considerably regarded.The requirement was implemented in order to guide editors in determining about whether an extent of an overlap between those papers warrants any publication of another the same design of paper. If, it were the opinion of the editor that the extent overlapping were substantial, that paper would more certainly be unpublished. There are some teachers that might allow the sam turned in papers that were used in separate classes providing that they were took as ways to do more editing and refining.
Given a context of a paper’s description published of two different papers being unfamiliar, an author then decides about including them in their own reviewing of literature by the paraphrasing of the relevant areas of a papers introduction as published including summaries of contributions of different style papers. An author then includes the papers as reference material in their manuscript’s reference area, along with what would be found with of a journal article from where the information was sourced. Finally, although an author cites a published article with at least a different context, they don't indicate that the article had been as a source of information by the other papers, which was not completely read. The described form of citation practice can cause risk by the possibility of other aspects of papers cited do not mostly provide support of the offending thesis of an author. Therefore, there could be some lapses in sensible regards. An author can choose to point well-known discoveries or theories and provide a reader with original citation. If that were to take place without misleading a reader into a belief that an author read a paper detailing a discovery while is thoroughly acquainted with the contents, then it would contain more quality in total and be more considerable.