Categories: News & Events

Is The Decision To Ban The Jehovah’s Witnesses In Russia Correct?

Just recently the Russian Supreme Court has rendered a decision prohibiting The Jehovah’s Witnesses from exercising its religious freedom in Russia. The decision further ordered the closing of all of Jehovah’s Witnesses 395 local chapters all over Russia.

Furthermore, the Russian Supreme Court has directed the confiscation of the property owned by the Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia.

The ruling of the Supreme Court of Russia has stemmed from the request of the Russian Ministry of Justice to declare this religious organization as an extremist group due to the refusal of its members to render military services and to allow any of its religious members to have blood transfusion.

For the past several years, the Jehovah’s Witnesses face increasing pressure inside Russia when it was banned to distribute its religious literature as being in violation of the Russian anti-extremism law.

There are around 170,000 religious members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses all over Russia. The counsel for the Russian Ministry of Justice has said that the Jehovah’s Witnesses “pose a threat to the right of the citizens, public order and public security.”

Russian Supreme Court Ruling Violates Article 18 Of The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights

   Russia is a party and signatory to the Universal Declaration Of Human Rights or the UDHR. Being a party to this Universal Declaration Of Human Rights, Russia has an international obligation to observe, implement and enforce the UNDR within its territory as part of the law of the land.

Such being the case the recent decision banning the Jehovah’s Witnesses to profess and exercise its religious freedom is against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Furthermore, this recent decision of the Russian Supreme Court has created a bad precedent since from now on the Russian Supreme Court has the power to declare

and ban any religion in Russia as an extremist group. It could further declare its property to be confiscated in the process.

Article 18 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights is very clear and straight forward, to quote:

Related Post

“Article 18

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

Therefore, there is no legal or constitutional argument that the decision of the Russian Supreme Court has violated Article 19 of the United Declaration on Human Rights.

According to the Russian spokesman of the Jehovah’s Witnesses Yaroslav Sivulskiy they will appeal the ruling of the Russian Supreme Court and they are very disappointed with this recent development and that they are very concerned as to how this recent ruling will going to affect their activity.

This recent ruling has far-reaching legal consequences not only to the members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses but to all persons who are members of any religion for that matter.

The ruling is indeed a big blow to the humanity’s march towards greater freedom and liberty from any governmental control with regards to one’s exercise and enjoyment of religious freedom.

It is hope that the appellate court or any International Tribunal where the Jehovah’s Witnesses appeal its case will eventually reverse and set aside the decision of the Russian Supreme Court.

Image source: http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/03/26/religious-freedom-the-four-part-series/

 

 

 




  • Arnold Cruz

    View Comments

    • That's incredible! I don't know but I'm pretty sure the Jehovah's Witnesses do the same thing here in America. I don't think we've ever thought it necessary to take them to the Supreme Court. By the way, I never really thought Russia was big on allowing religious freedom anyway. So the decision is not really shocking or surprising. Maybe I'm wrong though. Maybe Russia does permit religious freedom. I just never thought they did. I'll admit I'm wrong if I'm wrong. Am I wrong?? (O.o)

    • Hi Treathyl FOX,

      Thank you very much for your reply. You are right in your observation. Russia is not known for its good record concerning the observance of human rights whether for the individual or group.

      I was talking early this morning to two members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses who are making a door to door distribution of their pamphlet or religious literature. And I asked them what’s happening now in Russia about their members there in relation to the recent decision of the Russian Supreme Court banning their religion.

      They told me that this is not the first time that such an incident happened in Russia. They told me that in the 1950’s during the time of Stalin members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses were hauled into a train and were deported from Russia.

      I hope members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses will find a legal remedy so that the decision of the Russian Supreme Court might be reverse.

      For me the said decision was a bad decision on the part of the Russian Supreme Court.

      Not only that, it reflect again on Russia’s bad record in so far as the observance of human right within its country is concern.

      Religious tolerance must always be observed.

      • Many leaders in ancient kingdoms learned the “secret of tolerance”. Sadly some of those in power don't realize that if you don't have people, you don't have a country or a kingdom.

        Don't leaders also understand that when they deport people they deport their intellligence, skills and talents too?

        Don't leaders understand that when they persecute or exploit people, that's not being a good leader. It's just making people angry! If you make people unhappy by mistreating them, it will eventually backfire in your face! The historical records all around the world prove this to be so.

        If the "religious" citizens are not causing disruption, committing crimes, etc.; and they are a part of the general population living in peace with their fellow man, why can't you just leave them alone? How hard can it be to keep the peace? You can rule a lot more people using peaceful methods than you can with ruthless power plays. It's easy for a leader to figure out which way is the path of peace. It's the opposite direction of the path that leads to war!

    Recent Posts

    Heart Attack Causes and its Solution

    What is the Main Cause of a Heart Attack? What is its Solution? A heart attack is the blockage of… Read More

    10 months ago

    Understanding the Debt Ceiling: Its Impact, Importance, and Implications

    In the vast economic arena, one term that often takes center stage, inciting extensive debates and discussions, is the "debt… Read More

    1 year ago

    De-Dollarization: The New World Order of Currency and Its Global Impact

    De-Dollarization: The Changing Face of Global Finance The financial landscape is in a state of flux, with an intriguing economic… Read More

    1 year ago

    Unstoppable Bayern Munich: The Story Behind Their 11th Consecutive Bundesliga Title

    The curtains closed on a dramatic Bundesliga season with Bayern Munich standing tall once again, clinching their 11th straight title.… Read More

    1 year ago

    Celine Dion Cancels Concert Tour Due to Deteriorating Stiff-Person Syndrome

    The Unfolding Story of Celine Dion's Health In recent news that has left fans across the globe stunned, iconic singer… Read More

    1 year ago

    Navigating the Crossroads: LeBron James, Anthony Davis, and the LA Lakers’ Uncertain Future

    As the echoes of the recent NBA season start to fade, the attention of enthusiasts is firmly glued to one… Read More

    1 year ago