If one attempts to write a good article, something that can be quoted they must use facts.  To use facts would open the door to plagiarism.   For example; imagine that you read;

“It was found that exposure to the Sun for at least fifteen minutes a day boosts the immune system”, in a medical journal.

You write; “According to the latest medical r…[Read more]

@kaylar

Hope if things are happening like this admin will surely look into it because, why should this site which generates good content be affected by this. I would like more business to come to the site too. As we need a strong site which has to increase its business too. It is beneficial to the site and the authors if current issues are discussed.

This is why this site is lowly rated.  There is very little to read.  You can NOT post about a political situation in Your country which would be of educational benefit as you would be calling the names of real people, describing real incidents, which would likely be mentioned in newspapers and texts.

I will cease from posting anything of real value.

@Kaylar

Feel sad about hearing this. As writers we should be able to write on different topics of interest on which we can share information. This also increases the scope of the articles which can be written by a writer. A writer writes based on experiences on life which may be from facts too. @support should look into this matters as to what…[Read more]

If I write;  Columbus landed on Jamaica in 1494… a plagiarism checker would ‘flag’ that because it is written everywhere.  It is true.

If I write that “Today, at the National Stadium, there is going to be a major conference of the People’s National Party,”   a plagiarism checker will flag that because it is an announcement in all the ne…[Read more]

@TreathyI Fox

@support

@Kaylar

@Mahesh

@cely

Here we are discussing about software which check and not about the humans who cheat that is a totally different topic.

One more thing is these checkers are giving different rates like plain search, deep search etc. If these software want to exist in the market they have to do a good job. If they…[Read more]

I think for people who spam bible verses or other religious stuff. Plagium and other software can quickly find that out. Also the amount of time it takes for it to find makes you wonder how effective they can be. I have found copyscape and plagium to be a good source for plenty of times. They can find out if anyone stolen your work or not. I would…[Read more]

@kaylar, the one who flagged you was an idiot or maybe satanic member he disliked God’s words. About that issue that seems ridiculous.How come you plagiarized those contents yours. That plagium has been programmed wrongly forgetting that there are so many words all humans need to use. If I write an article entitled Why are you sad? I am so sure…[Read more]

If you wrote about a passage in the Bible and quoted the passage, your item would be flagged for plagairism.  That is the problem with these idiotic checkers.   You would post something like;

“In the Bible, Genesis 1 verse 29, says; (and you would quote it) “and then be charged with plagiarism by the mods here.

I have written factual items, u…[Read more]

It’s not a question of trusting the software that checks for plagiarism. It’s just a fact that we can’t trust other human beings not to plagiarize our content. If there were no dishonest people stealing the hard work of other people, the computer program would have not had to be written to catch those defrauders. As the Internet is vast and it is…[Read more]