In nations in which the population is virtually homogeneous, the way to delineate the classes is often done by what is called ‘Branding on the Tongue‘. This term refers to how one speaks. The accent, the words used, even how the words are used is considered.
One can easily hear this by listening to the British Broadcasting Company where the ‘serious’ news presenters speak in a certain language with a particular accent, where the Sports Reporters have a different accent and use words differently.
The Motion Picture, My Fair Lady, is an excellent display of this ‘Branding on the Tongue.’ An English Professor took a Flower Seller who spoke in the Cockney accent, (recognised as that used by the under class) and taught her to speak as if she came from the Upper Class.
In Jamaica, for example, the Upper Class spoke English at the highest level. Although they would have a ‘Jamaican Accent’ or a kind of influence on the way they spoke, their English was impeccable. Considering that the Examinations given to Enter High School and University were set in Cambridge. Obtaining an ‘A’ on a G.C.E. ‘O’ level or ‘A’ level exam, was an ‘A’, for whether taken in London or Llandeway, (a town in a Parish in Jamaica) it was the same Exam.
When Michael Manley made School Free, and set University entrance on Merit and Merit Alone, many so-called ‘upper class’ people were enraged that the child of the woman who cleaned their toilet had gotten a Free Place at University and their spoiled darling did NOT.
The plot, which was incredibly successful, was to have the under class disqualify itself from higher education by pushing the Patwa fi wi langwij program.
Firstly, English examinations were replaced by ‘local’ examinations. The CXC (Caribbean Examinations) replaced the G.C.E. and obtaining qualifications in that milieu was not accepted in foreign institutions.
Secondly, there was a push, using a English Professor at the University, to write a column in a daily in Patwa. As if it were a language.
Thirdly, the demand a child speak proper English was dropped and many teachers who did not themselves speak or write proper English were hired.
The Upper Class maintained their hegemony in English so that their children would get the best places at local schools and often be sent to private schools where they could take English or American exams and step into society at a higher level than the child who graduated local schools with CXCs.
Things have become so bad that many ex-pats who operate businesses in Jamaica have to hire translators to communicate with the workers.
However, as people speak their own versions of patwa, it is not unusual that they don’t understand each other.
This often leads to convictions at the Court where the Prosecutor will ask a question in standard English and the witness or accused will not understand. The answer given by the non-English speaker often results in an unexpected conviction or surprising release, for their evidence is twisted.
In a Rape Case, a woman described being pulled off the road and taken to a house where the man had sex with her.
The Defendant’s attorney, aware of the woman’s lack of English comprehension, questioned the Complainant and used the following words.
“You were on the road when the accused embraced you?”
“Yes.”
“And you and he strolled to the house.”
“Yes.”
“And then, inside of the house, he made love to you?”
“Yes.”
The accused was exonerated.
This is because the woman did not know the difference between ‘grab’ and ’embrace’ did not not understand the connotations of ‘stroll’ nor that ‘make love’ was not a synonym for rape.
By using the ability/inability to speak proper English for/against the citizen, they can be painlessly divided into classes. Those from the bottom will remain in the bottom, while those at the top remain at the top. Never again will the house holder be embarrassed by the woman who cleans the toilet having her child accepted at university contra his.
The amazing thing about the Branding is that those who are Branded are proud of their ‘brand’ and do not appreciate the limitations they have accepted for themselves and inflicted on their children.
What is the Main Cause of a Heart Attack? What is its Solution? A heart attack is the blockage of… Read More
In the vast economic arena, one term that often takes center stage, inciting extensive debates and discussions, is the "debt… Read More
De-Dollarization: The Changing Face of Global Finance The financial landscape is in a state of flux, with an intriguing economic… Read More
The curtains closed on a dramatic Bundesliga season with Bayern Munich standing tall once again, clinching their 11th straight title.… Read More
The Unfolding Story of Celine Dion's Health In recent news that has left fans across the globe stunned, iconic singer… Read More
As the echoes of the recent NBA season start to fade, the attention of enthusiasts is firmly glued to one… Read More
View Comments
Language is for communication, not miscommunication and misunderstanding. Whatever the rules or conventions or grammatical structure, etc. may be … if you're not communicating then you're simply not speaking the same language. If people want to live together and get along, they better figure out how to talk to each other.
For the record, why would any judge let the lawyer get away with asking the witness a stupid question like that? Why would any jury not look at the lawyer with a wary eye? Why wouldn't the opposing attorney object? Simple. The case wasn't about justice.
Having been in Court. The Prosecutor had sat, the Defence rose, and quietly asked the questions and got the answers. Why interfere? If you were giving evidence; "I was on Literacy Base at six o'clock' and I stood up, "Is that post meridian or anti- meridian?" and you said 'anti' did I trick you when you confused anti with post? Nope.
There was a case, a young man was charged with an offense. His alibia; "I went to the midnight show at the Palace..." the offence happened shortly before one... the very witness who put him on the scene had testified he was at the midnight show.
I knew, the Court didn't, that a 'midnight show' starts at 11:30
You said the accused was exonerated. Exonerated? That means nothing ever happened. Innocence proven all because a person couldn't speak English properly? Suppose the poor woman couldn't speak English. She spoke another language. Or worse, she was mute and couldn't scream for help. I get very touchy about injustice. But especially about rape cases because almost always there usually are only 2 eye witnesses: the rapist and the victim.
The Rapist was found Not Guilty by the Jury. The address of Defence counsel focused on 'consent'. Embrace, Stroll, Make Love.
This is the cost of not speaking English. At no time did the complainant seem unfamiliar with the terms, changed them, asked them to be repeated. Her evidence is as I gave it. This is just one example... possibly the most obvious.
In America, if you can raise a reasonable doubt in a criminal case then the accused can be set free. I understand the Defense has to do their job. Their job is to defend the accused. The Defense did their job. But there were other responsible parties involved who had a job to do too! Seems like not everybody wasn't doing their job. It happens a lot. Not just in your country.
People will use your weakness against you. In Ja. it has led to a lot of out sourcing. A lot of jobs have been filled by ex-pats because Jamaicans can't speak English. I'm going to blog about it