Is it okay that a government control what we will talk only one or we can decide this for yourself?
As an adult I wish to decide who to talk to , and who will be my friend.
I can change my opinion tomorrow, or never, it will be up to me and not up to some regulation.
This government involvement means that you will not be able to say what you mean, even if the person on the other site of the wire is completely wrong, but you won’t be able to speak your mind because that will hurt their feelings?
I am not sure how this resonates with the logic? How can one control the entire internet?
It is impossible, you will say. But it is not so. I will tell you later why it is possible and why this actually can happen.First, I want to express my opinion, why this is wrong.
I think that this small question sound so ridiculous to many people who are used to have a freedom of the speech, and by the way, their governments could not care less how many grudged and harsh words they let upon themselves, just because they allow it to.
At the end, everything comes down to a logic, we let it happen.
If we don’t want it, simple as this, we can block a person who we dislike. Unfollow and block are still the best practice around here.
You see, I found out a post on this page that quite adequately asks if there is a way that government controls the internet because the honest people’s feelings get hurt.
Honest people work and get paid accordingly, but when they feelings get hurt … this is when a logic stops to exist … the same people turn vindictive because they were treated bad.
Is this about the verbally offensive issues? Is this about money not being paid??
I don’t know because a post is a bit confusing.
But, I am sure it has something with the networkers and money not being paid, still it takes a minority to make a rule for the rest of the internet users who don’t have any connection with online work. They maybe just surf and communicate.
I am not sure if I understood this sentence correctly. I might be wrong. I don’t know.
The thing I found ridiculous is that somebody would found my personal relation with anybody what so ever, even remotely interesting to be monitored. Nevertheless, monitored by the government.
What would they find? I don’t like you, go away type of a chat? Or what did you cook for lunch?
The many of people, numerous citizens have nothing interesting in their life, but to work, spend time with family, eat, sleep, watch tv, enjoy some activity or music… so where that puts a government as an authority?
Where is it a part of my life, that spying?
Simply nowhere, the government can eardrop and every single of your conversations, because they can own a right to spy an equipment, phone lines that are basically just one set per smaller country.
Bigger countries have more sets or companies in these businesses around the telephony and phones, but smaller maybe one.
So, this is a way how somebody can monitor an entire country over the internet, not the internet as a whole, but just a segment. You can also use only phones that are from the certain company, not the whole. If you have a broadband connection that is kind of impossible because you can literally jump.
I check this info online, and it seems legit, but to control the whole internet it is completely impossible.
Why would any government chose to spy on their people? Is this what we are paying from our taxes?
Yes, this is exactly what you are paying, and that is giving your own protection in an exchange for the fake safety.
Why is our security fake if our government is obligated to protect us?
It is not far fetched to assume that the government only obligated to protect an interest of the country and that interest does not necessarily include you in person.
So, you say that my personal safety is not a consideration of a government? I pay for that?
Ye s, we pay, but sometimes there are cases that are not obligatory to follow.
You see, an every government will adjust their actions to the needs of majority, and if they can’t get away with an exemplary case, they will not pull any actions to solve one that is with no substance to chime through the media.
This comes my idea that we all have to protect yourself in those speculative cases where our police and law can’t help us. And that we definitely have to protect our benefits and mental health, because some people online don’t exist for nothing but to hurt us.
That is only my opinion. I don’t know, I could be wrong.
But, I placed this question on an open debate on another page. An every single person who included him or herself in a debate aid they will not like the idea of lost freedom or government being inside their private things. It doesn’t matter how much they have to pass through, or how much their emotions have to sore. It is up to us to develop some shell and to accept the world as it is.
World is made of people, good, bad and worse, and we brought them to the internet not by the chance,m but by the wishful thinking.
We all need money, yes? We all need to pay our bills and buy food, yes?
Some people use all their payments they receive to pay even bills, housing or rent – it depends where do they live, yes.
It is sad to see that some governments are closing the access to internet or even banning their people to use it, making them even more poor and cut away from the world.
Well, there’s your problem. Why do you think that every single one of us will use a blatantly honest ways to work? Don’t you think there are cheaters in real life.
They always take very long breaks between sets to work. They always get better benefits. They go to the big man for loans, because their children seem to deserve better, than yours?
So, why people get soared feelings after seeing this on the internet?
Internet didn’t invent this. This was there before. this is only a technology that reflects world as it truly is.
What is the Main Cause of a Heart Attack? What is its Solution? A heart attack is the blockage of… Read More
In the vast economic arena, one term that often takes center stage, inciting extensive debates and discussions, is the "debt… Read More
De-Dollarization: The Changing Face of Global Finance The financial landscape is in a state of flux, with an intriguing economic… Read More
The curtains closed on a dramatic Bundesliga season with Bayern Munich standing tall once again, clinching their 11th straight title.… Read More
The Unfolding Story of Celine Dion's Health In recent news that has left fans across the globe stunned, iconic singer… Read More
As the echoes of the recent NBA season start to fade, the attention of enthusiasts is firmly glued to one… Read More
View Comments
Freedom of speech is sometimes put to abuse of some haters. There should be some restrictions as to what to say like in other countries like New Zealand they cannot just air their grievances or grudges because there are restrictions.
Philippines has lots of freedom that are not beneficial for people and government. Sometimes media is the root cause of some fake reports.