If a person is hungry is it right for him or her to steal food in order to satisfy one’s hunger? If you don’t have money to finance the hospital operation of any of your love ones is it ok to rob a bank just to have money?
In the first example the means is to steal and the end is to satisfy one’s hunger. While in the second example the means is to rob a bank and the end is to finance hospital operation.
In both examples do the means justify the ends?
Ethics: The Science Of Right Or Wrong
In our modern world and as our society progress, the perception of society with regards to the concept of right or wrong seems to change. This is especially most felt with the weakening of the traditional means of control and influence: family, school, church and government.
From the point of view of Ethics, there is such thing as the idea or concept of what is right, in the same way that there is also the concept of what is wrong.
These two basic concepts of right or wrong are two distinct and separate notions and as such cannot exist at the same time with regards to the effect or consequences of one’s act.
If there is no such concept of right or wrong then all human acts will be the same, meaning it cannot be classify either as right or wrong.
Common sense and experience tell us, that there is such a thing as right or wrong on the basis of the consequences or effect of one’s conduct to one self, to others, and to the society.
In the given example of stealing or robbing, it encourages laziness not to find job or other right means in order to support oneself or one’s family needs. Further, such act itself implies lack of respect to the property belonging to others.
If the there is no such thing as the concept of right or wrong then, everyone could steal or rob depending upon one’s reasons for doing so. In such a case, there would no longer be any moral absolutes or moral values that human beings are suppose follow.
The Moral Absolute Of Right Or Wrong Conduct
There is such a thing as the moral absolute of right or wrong conduct. It always exists and which presupposes any human action. Without these moral absolutes then human action will have no guide and there’s no standard or any reference point for the effect or consequence of one’s conduct.
In connection with this premise, it may be ask if human beings are essentially moral beings. I believe that human beings are essentially moral being for there is the basic ethical postulate “to do good and avoid evil”.
How could any human beings do good if there is no such thing as “good” in the first place? And how could human beings avoid “evil” if there is no such thing as “evil” in the first place?
Thus, any human act for that matter must always be weight and measure with the prism of the moral absolute of right or wrong conduct.
What is the Main Cause of a Heart Attack? What is its Solution? A heart attack is the blockage of… Read More
In the vast economic arena, one term that often takes center stage, inciting extensive debates and discussions, is the "debt… Read More
De-Dollarization: The Changing Face of Global Finance The financial landscape is in a state of flux, with an intriguing economic… Read More
The curtains closed on a dramatic Bundesliga season with Bayern Munich standing tall once again, clinching their 11th straight title.… Read More
The Unfolding Story of Celine Dion's Health In recent news that has left fans across the globe stunned, iconic singer… Read More
As the echoes of the recent NBA season start to fade, the attention of enthusiasts is firmly glued to one… Read More