Those people who dislike our president are drug addicts. For so many years, there was one in the presidential side who did the way President DU30 is doing at present,none , right?
I wonder about the mentality of some why they want to remain traditional. Maybe they like traditional politician,for they can continue to corrupt the Filipino people.Just imagine the buller olanting that stained the reputation pf our country,If not throw President DU30, out NAIA airport will remain scary this time. Thanks for treading.

One thing about the actress, her words created a clear divide. You sure can tell the people who support the nation’s leader and the people who don’t. Just because a person is a junkie (drug addict) doesn’t mean their words are not true. Either he is or he isn’t. That remains to be proven.

On thing I’ve noted is there are a lot intense, controversial, “explosive” events being reported in the Philippines since Duerte was elected. My goodness! Has he even been president for a year? Perhaps these are things he believes need to be done just to get things settled, so he can get on with creating order and making the country great! Hate to think what is happening now are the “calm before the storm” moments of his administration and that the years ahead are going to be a lot more heated, more tense and more difficult for the ordinary law-abiding hard-working peaceful decent citizens.

Another thing? In the US, we hear a lot more about what’s going on in the Philippines in our news than we used to since Duerte became president. It’s rather worrisome to other countries when a country that wasn’t heard of much is all of a sudden on the radar. The citizens of the other countries start wondering about the “ripple effect”. In other words, how far reaching is the situation in one country and what impact will that situation have on their country? When a country’s activities start getting reported in our media, that means that place is carefully monitored for potential “spill over” into US!

Mrs. Isidro is a drug addict. There will be some monkeys always to spoil a good event. For Mr. Duterte eradication of Drugs in Philippines is the main goal of his administration. The people though initially make a hue and cry over the killings of the pushers have now realized and supporting Mr. Duterte and even ready to take up a campaign in this regard. The parents who lost their beautiful and handsome children are now moving towards making their nation a stronger one than it was earlier under other Presidents.

Mr. Duterte is a boon for the people of Philippines. If one or two mad people make comments it does not make any difference. They made similar comments earlier when the earlier Presidents had worked at all. Now they are making comments who is working for the people and his own Nation with dedication. So the comments have no value at all. They can be treated and thrown into a trash bag.

Now the Philippines has become a role model for taking stringent action against the drug peddlers and so the drug addicts and the Dons in other countries are fearing a lot to face the same situation from the Governments of their countries.

The whole world is looking at the Philippines and at Mr. Duterte now .

People are depending the president are rude, people who are against the president are rude, there is really a division among the people in the Philippines, the reason is because the president is also rude. He goes on with his offensive remarks which is becoming a common to the Filipinos, which means we can also be common like him talking harsh words. What is becoming to the country and its people and yet we are just on 100 days of him. He thinks Federalism is good and brawl US, and praises communist government like China and Russia.

Nice post friend.English cannot be made perfect,unless write only very few words and very s short sentences.If translate your own language to English, it cannot be matched the way we do using our own dialect for we know well the language that is part of our everyday lives.

For me translation is fairly easy as I am fluent in both English and French (Canadian). But I agree with Cely that English is a language of few words compared to French for example. an English book for example might be 200 pages while the French book is 300 to 400 pages. Some languages like French are more difficult than other languages with their different grammar, accents etc.

Translation is a very difficult job. A writer who opts for translation jobs should have sound knowledge of two languages at least. He should be perfect in choosing and using the words. The expression is not at all a criteria for a translation job. Because you take the subject as per the tone of the article. But, he should be thorough with a ocean of vocabulary .

A writer will come across a variety of translations like Technical translation, scientific translation, Administrative translation, etc,

Among all these the Administrative Translation involves the usage of a variety of words and terms. The words used in the administration touch upon various branches of administration like Industry, commerce, literature, transport, irrigation, police dept, energy matters, telephones, etc, So for translating the work relating to administration one should be thorough with a vast vocabulary relating to many departments. Once a writer becomes perfect he can have some basic knowledge of the various terms relating to each department.
One of the hardest parts of translation one encounter in the translation is making a translation of a scientific article. There the writer need not focus much on the grammatical use. But he should choose and use each scientific name with precision and can not use in a vague manner.

The translation jobs require one’s dedication to the work and one has to put forth ones 100 percent to get the work done.

Mist of the students who are non native feel national language translation into international language very very difficult due to having no real sense of grammar of English language. The main cause of translation that they have to real concept of English Language as I have observed. I am also MA English, Master of English language and literature.

For example in English grammar there is no difference between the present tense and future tense because future tense tell man’ intention and present tense also near future intention. Non native makes difference between the two tenses while not,

Both tenses tell us that an incomplete intention in future is the main cause of confusion. Besides, grammar there are a lot of grammatical phrases that are spoken in English are not known to the non native speaker.

For example: in non native speaker English (It is better for you to read your lesson) But it is the replica of the original phrase. But the native speaker will say thus *(you)had better read your lesson)

There are a lot of phrases in English. O have written a Grammar Book, Name (Sayyar English Grammar)It is a complete book on English grammar.

I have translated hundreds of books in English from Urdu because I live in Pakistan.

Thanks.

No. It will be wrong assumption to think that there will be no poverty. Will the poverty disappear by encouraging vocational courses in the Rural villages and in the Rural Areas? As long as the unscrupulous politicians and the system is there the disappearance of poverty will be only a day dream.

In India also such promises were made to the people and some
programs were introduced. The people were trained. Some of them could get jobs. As the programme continued the number of unemployeds in the vocational certificates increased. Another scheme was launched providing financial assistance to those remained unemployed to set up their own industries. To some extent some people got a livelihood.

Suddenly the wicked nature appeared by taking up the Agricultural lands which were neglected by the people for construction activities. The agricultural landlords became helpless. He is compelled to forgo his fertile lands. Already some politicians purchased these lands from the farmers and after the introduction of the scheme, they got huge compensation from the Government.

Ultimately the farmers lost their fertile agricultural lands. The shortage of food production is likely to be felt very shortly forcing the Government to go for important which is totally a brainless planning.