In Jamaica, while a case is going on, one is not to discuss the aspects of it.  Although in high profile cases the news will report who took the stand or when an adjournment is granted, the legal bits are not to be discussed.

Once a case is decided, the entire judgment can be published.

In Jamaica we publish our decided cases   If you go here; http://supremecourt.gov.jm/content/judgments

you’ll get the raw judgements, names of everyone, the lawyers, the judges, the accused…

Hi Cely or Erly Maglangit,

I will reproduced here your groundless, baseless, malicious, unprofessional and unethical allegations that you levelled against me, you stated:

 
“1. The blogs relate about cases and names of defendants and plaintiffs are mentioned ; thereby, violations of secrecy of the Philippine Constitution and under the crime…[Read more]

@Arnold Cruz, I am so sorry if you feel insulted, I am only so concerned for you. I think you are a lawyer so you know much than me.Peace! I will never interfere in your future affairs here. We are here as one team, one family like in Ml helping each other.There is no mental reservation as to the interference of your blogs that were more on cases…[Read more]

Hi Cely,

Danger of conspiracy by whom? What do you mean by conspirasy? LiteracyBase in danger of what?

Questions:

1. Who is the one sowing wild rumours and baseless intrigue concerning my Blog entitled “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied”? You.

2. Who is the one who did not first verify all the facts and circumstances concerning the source of…[Read more]

Hi everyone in LiteracyBase,

Just a gentle reminder to everyone here in LiteracyBase concerning ARTICLE 19 OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN RELATION TO FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS in relation to any blog that may be posted here in LiteracyBase:

“ARTICLE 19

Everyone has the RIGHT OF FREEDOM…[Read more]

Hi Cely,

Again as a brotherly advise and as a gentle reminder as  fellow practitioner in the writing profession, let me refresh your mind regarding the CODE OF ETHICS OR CANON OF JOURNALISM:

I. RESPONSIBILITY;

II. FREEDOM OF THE PRESS;

III. INDEPENDENCE;

IV. SINCERITY, TRUTHFULNESS, ACCURACY;

V. IMPARTIALITY;

VI. FAIRPLAY AND…[Read more]

Hi Cely,

You can read each and every criminal cases that I used as case references from Part 1 up to the last part of my Blog entitled “Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied” in the aformentioned Official Website of the Philippine Supreme Court.

For sure, you will be able to read all of these criminal cases in the aforementioned Official Website of…[Read more]

Hi Cely,

To proved my point that all the criminal cases published as part of the Jurisprudence by the Philippine Surpeme Court in their website ARE NOT CONFIDENTIAL IN NATURE BUT RATHER A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD, MEANING OPEN TO THE PUBLIC TO SEE AND READ, I am reproducing below SECTION 7, ARTICLE III BILL OF RIGHTS  of the 1987 PHILIPPINE…[Read more]

Hi Cely,

Thank you for your concern although it is misplaced. Thank you also for your correction regarding the apparent “grammatical error” although I did not make or appoint you as my grammar teacher. I do not need any insult or sarcasm from you.

Now to get directly to the apparent issues that you are raising:

1. The basis of all the posting…[Read more]

@peachpurple,Hi Peach? You are right , it must not be allowed for those posts were confidential matters and were exposed here. There were so many of them as far as I remember almost 40 blogs related with crimes from the different files of the courts of law.There are so many sources of blog posrs that are so simple yet nice to be called quality blog.

@suny, That is true, the same way as in TV shows the host of the show and the station itself are not held responsible for what is to be shown.I am glad that this site , in case, by circumstantial a relative happens to read a case own by their relatives, it will be the writer himself responsible for the actions.Thanks for your valuable share of…[Read more]

@Anthony Davis , Hello Anthony, actually that was what I scared about confidential files of cases posted here in this exposed blog site. What if the relatives happen to read the case of their relatives, they might question the court. I think we can discuss a blog about a case but never would be names of involved defendants and plaintiffs be…[Read more]

I think it is best not to bring court or government or politic articles here because every country has its own rules that other countries might not agree.

As for the admin of the site, it is up to them to allow or disallow the article to be publish since it is sensitive issue involved

In fact the every website writes it in their rules that they do not take any responsibility for all blogs and posts as they are authors own views and site has nothing to do with any of them. There is no responsibility of website but author of all such posts is held responsible.

We were all told before taking an oath during jury duty last week, all of us were instructed that if we were chosen as jurors in a trial, we were not to watch news or read the newspaper or go online or talk about a case on social media as any of these would be a violation and that we would be sworn to not even talk amongst ourselves about the case…[Read more]

That is true. I wonder what sort of vulgar word was used that may come into violation. Because as we are culturally diverse, Things may come across like what we call violation may not apply to other. Then again we have to let the support work on that. As that may solve problem in sites perspective instead of what we consider as violation. That’s…[Read more]

Glad you received your payment with no problems 🙂