Homeopathy medicines are the best medicines all over the world with the passage of time allopathy will disappear from whole world because homeopathy will uproot the diseases and its root cause from human life organs.

The law of similars states that whatever would cause your symptoms, will also cure those same symptoms. Thus, if you find yourself unable to sleep, taking caffeine will help; streaming eyes due to hayfever can be treated with onions, and so on. This so-called law was based upon nothing other than Hahnemann’s own imagination.

You don’t need to have a medical degree to see the flawed reasoning in taking caffeine – a stimulant – to help you sleep; yet caffeine is, even today, prescribed by homeopaths (under the name ‘coffea’) as a treatment for insomnia.

Despite being rooted in supersition, ritual and sympathetic magick, the laws devised by Hahnemann are still in use by homeopaths today.

For Hahnemann’s Laws to be correct, we would have to toss out practically everything we have learned over the past two centuries about biology, pharmacology, mathematics, chemistry and physics. Illnesses are not effectively treated by administering substances which cause similar symptoms; serial dilution and succussion does not ‘potentize’ a remedy. Water has no memory, nor any way of using one if it did! Homeopathy could never work in the way Hahnemann described it, but does it work at all?

Modern homeopaths believe that this ‘potentization’ process allows the water to retain the ‘memory’ or ‘vibrations’ of the original substance, long after it has been diluted away to nothing. Of course, there is no good scientific evidence to suggest that water has such an ability, nor any indication of how it might be able to use this ‘memory’ to cure a sick patient.

nice and beautiful…….

Do you really think that there is no literal heaven and hell?

Have you really researched this topic very well before making your Conclusions.

Not directly but there are sites which offer very focused and niceh information and they try to earn through web page hits and advertising.

Are roses not a common flower in India? If not, what are the flowers of India? (Blog post idea perhaps?)

I just gave that as an example. Not all are good in the art of searching. Those who offer these services should be good at hitting the target.

Wow well thought out and well written!

when i was child , i have 1 dog, he is black , i like him, until one he died, so sad

Woes is the child anxiety and spring from sad soul. Anxiety – is a kind of sorrow that emerges when the mind is weighed down with something so as to make escape seem impossible.

Thomas’ definition is likely rooted in the Latin word angustia which means a narrow pass or straight. And thus anxiety tends to arise when we experience stress about a situation and find no room to maneuver, no way out. Anxiety also tends to regard the future, whereas pain regards to present. In pain, one can suffer in the moment about the situation, but knows that it will pass.

But anxiety arises when we sense no determined end to the painful situation, no room to maneuver, and no way out.

Pity is the sorrow that we feel for the evil or misfortune endured by another person. But it is deeper than mere regret or perturbance. Pity is to experience the misfortune of another, as though it were our own.

Remedies for Woe betide
Weeping
Sharing our sorrows with friends
Contemplating the truth
Pleasure
A Warm bath and naps

Act upon these points if someone is woe betide

It’s true that the Internet is the best invention since the napkin and one of the best educational resources ever invented by whoever invented it (read the tech history but forgot!). However, as you say it is overloaded with tons of misinformation and even erroneous information and one does have to sift through a lot of it to extract the gold. But I for one am very happy to have an online library right at my finger tips.

So many ads that annoy me and annoy you and others.The ads here are getting numerous and so noisy. I just ignore them and click to kick them away.Maybe thus site would survive because of these companies they might want us too to get into.

For sure ad blockers impacts a site’s revenue stream. But not everybody sets their browsers to block ads. I don’t. I don’t like the way my blog looks when I turn on the ad blocker feature. I’m just hoping other people are not as annoyed with ads as it has been reported. I mean … advertising has always been crucial to any type of media, whether it’s television, radio, etc. Why should the Internet be different? It’s a form of media. I do get that too many ads can be annoying. But ads generate income because companies pay to have their products and services advertised at various websites and blogs. So there is the “push back” that makes me think, no matter what ads are not going away! However, with ad blockers, companies have to get more creative and work around them to get the word about the goods and services they offer to the consumer! Of course, this is just my opinion. I could be wrong! 🙂

You are very right, Grace. Ads are the lifeblood of a site. And not just on revenue-sharing sites, but on all sites. Even huge sites like Facebook or BuzzFeed depend on their advertisers for the revenue that keeps the sites alive. So using an ad blocker on any site can be detrimental. And if we enjoy a site, it’s only right to allow them to display the ads that provide their revenue.

That being said, most site owners are very open to feedback about the quality and placement of their ads. If ads are in some way offensive, if they significantly interfere with use of the site (e.g. pop-up ads that cover every page that loads) or if the ad causes users to worry about their safety or their bandwidth usage (ads that hijack browsers, ads that autoplay video, etc.) a good site owner wants to hear their users’ concerns.

Site owners don’t control what content shows up when the ads are served, but good site owners will usually work with their users and with their advertisers to minimize risks for site users and to ensure that the ads are not posing a significant impediment to the use of the site.

Any site owner that ignores the feedback or refuses to eliminate ads that are repeatedly reported as an issue is asking the users to bear the consequences while he earns the cash. That is not the sign of a responsible site owner, and I don’t blame users who choose to block ads on such a site.

We each must decide what’s best for us. If a site is otherwise pleasant to visit, but the owner cannot or will not respond to user reports concerning the ads, he has only himself to blame for the loss of revenue. Ads are not the users’ responsibility and ultimately, it’s their right to decide the ads are too objectionable on a given site.

I agree that adblockers can be quite a problem on sites which rely on them to feed revenue in order to pay users. It has to be a trust based system. Owners must trust users to not use blockers and users must understand that by allowing the ads to show, they are helping to fund the site.

Writing website should use ads which cannot be blocked using ad blockers like banner ads,text ads

It’s actually the infolinks pop-up here that makes me stay away. I all pop-ups very annoying. People who write for a site put up with it because they want the site to earn. People who have nothing to gain from the ads have no reason to keep being annoyed. They will either block ads or just stay away from the site. Those responses, both of which cut site income, hurt both members and site owners. We want to encourage outside visitors, not discourage them.

Ads as we all know is the mainstay for any writing site. I am not sure if LiteracyBase has any control over, for example, infolinks the way they keep moving as also the FB Ads. This has been brought to their notice. May be later when they have wider and better choices they may drop them.