President of the Philippines Mr. Duterte is very sportive and generous. He gladly accepted the work of Mr. Ferdinand Marcos who introduced a very powerful agricultural economy in the Philippines. There is nothing wrong if Mr.Duterte says that he would like to copy some of the programs of Mr. Marcos. It is here his sportiveness is quite visible to the public. The Philippines is really lucky to have him as its President.

The case has been dragged on for years together and finally went in favor of Mr. Marcos. The 20 years for a single case over the burial of the ex-president is really ignoble. The people should feel sorry for it. How can a case of such nature be prolonged for years together?
In India, a case of disproportionate assets was lodged against the Chief Minister of Tamilnadu State. The case was dragged on for years together. After several years, when Modiji became the Prime Minister the case has been taken up for final hearing. She has been jailed. However, she appealed to the Apex Court and finally the case has been disposed of giving a clean chit to the Chief Minister. This is one of the longest pending cases in India which took nearly 25 years.

If the chief Minister is clean who are at fault now? Where has the money really come from to celebrate the marriage of her son in a very grand and lavish manner? Nobody is questioning this point. How can the Apex court exonerate the chief Minister of the charges is also quite surprising.

The above two cases are quite different. But the method of disposal is the same. Is there anything wrong the judicial system prevailing in the countries? or they simply let the culprits of on the basis of lack of evidence?