Yes, it it true, hope soon this will get rectified. Unlike other sites, the page loading is small , however cash loading is quick than other sites which we expect most of the time

oh I thought this was a problem with my internet or laptop. Yes the pages does take longer than normal to load.

This applies to blog, forum and well as write here page.

Is it easier to get work done on an actual computer than the cell phone? Does it work faster?

For a blog minimum 300 words are required .
For responding on forum and blogs I do not think any minimum or maximum word limit is applied.

Yes,that’s true. It takes time to load the page.Even going from one activity to another is also time taking.

blog posts should be 300 words or more not 300 characters. So double check your article. To make sure that you have 300 words use online word culculator. Make sure you have written quality and unique  content.

I noticed that too especially during my first days here. I signed up Feb.28 and started writing March 1. Maybe the admins can do something about this to make the site run faster, so we can interact more and post more blogs.

I ran a load test.. Response time is 36 seconds which is not good. You can find the details below:

https://www.webpagetest.org/result/170307_A7_1BPP/

This is a good idea.Will do the same @Mahesh.

I didn’t find much difference. I guess the amount of widgets loading can make that issue some times. But overall I didn’t noticed much issue. Have you run any loading test or speed test on the webpage?If yes, then you can share your observation. I am sure many of us can find out more from that part. For me it loads normal so far. I’d check out the…[Read more]

So I am not the only one who face this.

I suggest writing 100 words each in paragraph. You need to get atelast 3 paragraph like that. You don’t have to write a lot. But writing more word count helps. 300 words gives you 15 cent. 500 words gives you 22 cents. So write more and you’d find that you have earned some decent money so far. That should answer your query.

I actually noticed the same. I hope it will improve.