Swimming is my sports. I am a deep sea swimmer since high school. We live near many beaches and deep sea.

An advantage that both individual and team sports share is that it helps in bringing people of different backgrounds together to interact. This is seen in the attendance in the stadiums and different arenas.

nasa is not losing any credibility, i guess they are great at their area, and i would not trust any thing else in that area but them, many agrees with me, i also know that they are human so mistake is expected but not to be big or many, thakns for the post and the view point you expressed

So what’s their explanation on the fluttering of the flag? And why would NASA tell lies? They would surely lose credibility if they do so.

NASA has to be rational and objective and not selective when it comes to doing their job. Whether NASA tells or not or believes or not I am not concerned. Many Indians like me believe in the Rama Sethu. Indians have to come with superior technology as this is a good opportunity for them to further establish their credibility and unravel things which were thought to not exist by other people. If they specialize in this they will get more such projects from countries who would want to know about their history.

The launch or 104 satellites in one shot and the launch of Mangalyan or Mission to Mars only at a fraction of the costs which developed countries spend is an achievement in itself. The ancient city of Dwaraka where God Shri Krishna lived and which is under the ocean was also discovered by the scientists in India. There is no limit in what we can do if we really set out achieve the same. Agencies like NASA or other such agencies should not play around with people of the world, their sentiments and the history. Professionalism is expected from such agencies which have a high reputation. If they play around with their reputation it will be at their on peril.

NASA is an unreliable source? That’s news to me! (O.o)

GOOD VIEW

My take on this is if one would want to use wall paper use it where children are not there like in an office or a hotel or similar other spaces. It can also be used in homes but only thing is that it may need to be changed a bit more than compared to paint. But when you change the same you can also get some new design or aesthetics which will be appealing to one and all and would look different.

Paints is what I prefer the majority of the homes where I have visited are using paints too. I feel that today there are specialized paints which are available in the industry due to innovation and these paints allow one to wash off the stains or any dirt which may have accumulated over a period of time. The number of years a house will look nice if painted also is more compared to wallpaper. This will save costs for the home owners in the long run. The only issue with paints is they contain chemicals like lead and other such things which are toxic to atmosphere and also to humans especially children. So they have to be checked and a good paint is to be used. A interesting article. Thanks for the share.

you can not say no for completely life with no processed food, since its in everthing you will find these things, in baking, in restaurants, in sweets in chips in tea or coffee in juice, there is nothing without processed food but too many little things and these things are high price, so we can not live without processed food, life is pricey now actually very pricey , so processed food rescue people, reduce it is good idea, but no for sure will not help any to live properly, also makeup has processed things and it goes to skin can people stop it, no. hopefully economy change and maybe then we can eat fresh food

It is a good decision which you have taken. But I feel totally stopping processed food would not instantly possible. But if we decided to go for it and are able to do so it is a good thing. But the important thing is we should not stop this in between and this should be a decision which we should continue for the whole of our life. It is wrong on the part of companies too to not inform the public of what they are doing and what are the harmful effects of the processed food. There should be some sort of labeling done for the public to know which food produced and packaged causes what harm and side effects.

Thirty years ago there was not much of packaged food industry. Majority of them were being manufactured by small scale industries which were family based. The quality was also good and so was the digestion. If one consumes additives and other things over a period of years it causes health issues which will be different among different individuals which one will not know till a long time. By this time the damage to the health would have been done and things would be irreversible. It is always better to be safe than be sorry. It is better to limit consumption of packaged food if not totally stop it. A important issue and a good article.