If I were writing for my local newspaper, for example, the items that were tossed would be published. On the Net, there is no way.   Sure, different headlines, but the same facts, usually in the same order.

I think if you ran the Plagiarism checker on one of those items, it would flag them.

It is called TAXES.  That is how it is Paid for.

Canada has ‘socialised’ medicine.  Is Canada a communist country?

@support  There is yet another issue.  When blogs appear in the blogs section users comment on them and earn something.  What will happen to those earning if the blogs are rejected at the time of redemption ?

@support  I fully appreciate your efforts to clean the site and it should be done at all costs. But putting the blogs on our dashboard and also updating our bank and then rejecting is what I do not approve of.  Once they come on our dashboards we share them. Is that the right thing to do specially those blogs that you will eventually reject?  …[Read more]

@support Also, what about sharing posts once they come to the dashboard and then they are rejected?

@support I fully appreciate your vigilance but my only request is that it is done before our blogs come to the dashboard.  Earlier you did that but you took too long for approval.  If you can approve our blogs say within 3 days then we could write further posts – earlier the better.

I have not been posting of late and I have no personal i…[Read more]

Since none of you know what you are talking about…   I was injured in a motor vehicle accident. I went up to America.  I landed on Monday, midnight.  I was operated on Tuesday at 9 am.  A pin was put into my leg.  I was given a wheelchair, I was given a walker.  I spent four days in the hospital then went to a rehab centre.   I was helped to wal…[Read more]

I prefer to write factual pieces and take information from various sources.  There is no way it can change.  If I am writing about any issue I want to be able to prove I am telling the truth.

Since my ‘slap down’ I am going to avoid factual pieces because there is really no way to post any thing factual or current without ‘copying’.    “…[Read more]

The problem is that if you write any factual piece, it is likely that it will be discarded for’plagiarism’  because somewhere in the world someone wrote “Donald Trump was elected President” .  This allows the Admin to play with plagairism so as to prevent you from cashing out.

Admin should check for quality or whatever before they update the bank and put the blogs in the dashboard and reject only after redemption.  This is wrong.  Many will leave. Making bloggers blog by the sweat of their brow only to be rejected at payment time is not correct. If they are not happy with the  quality  blogs should be rejected bef…[Read more]

There are few things the blogger already knows are violations

1. Less than 300 words

2. short titles

3. plagiarised text and images.

And as for quality that lies with the site and they should pointit out before placing the blogs in the dashboard.

1

I highly disapprove of Admin’s method of first giving  the go ahead signal by placing  blogs in the dashboard, update the bank and then at the time of redemption decide to reject those that do not meet with their requirements.  The blogs should be checked for violations before letting the blogger writes further posts.

Blog should be rejected or…[Read more]