Okay first and foremost it’s not only women who talk badly about their men even men do talk badly about their women. Women may be gossipers yes but men are just as bad in fact worse. Okay when you find a woman talking badly about her man she’s usually at a point of no return. We all know that women are caring beings and that they like peace and bring people together in harmony.But if you disrespect a woman and show her that she’s not worth your time you are giving her more reason to go out there and say bad things about you. Now if we talk about the men, if a man has a side dish (mistress) he will do anything or say anything to make her happy and make her feel like shes loved right? And this will include telling his girlfriend how the wife is a bad cook, she doesnt know how to dress and stuff like all in the name of trying to make a woman feel special now if that is not bad mouthing i dont know what it is. In most cases what men say is always lies but what women say always tirns out to be true.

@anitah, i agree with your argument but you have seen it from only the angle where the man has a mistress. In a case like this she speaks bad of her to another woman and making a fellow woman more important. But i am speaking generally and i didn’t mean men don’t do this but you will rearly see a man talk bad of the woman he is marriade to and they still live together unless it has gotten to the point of no return like you said. I am an example, many years ago i was involved in a relationship, and i made family and friends see her as the best but after about 3 years i could take forgiving over and over for cheating, so when she went with thesame man i saved her from 3 years before i was devasted and felt used but she came back after 3 months because he dumped her again but i didnt accept her back this time. Family didn’t know why so they were against me, after much pressure i had to say why i can’t take her back and all she did, she was hated immediately. But then i was sure it was the end before i said het fouls. Many men do this but women sits amongst eachother and speak bad for their men, what they don’t do right, how they are not responsible but more about their misunderstanding at home and fights. This bring look down on their marriages. But sure between these women they don’t see these about eachother that same like they see their friends man, so she sees theirs also. But it a calamity when it breaks open especially from a quarrel between 2 friends and they insult eachothers men….. Woooo. There you hear them speak what they have gossiped about their men. This write up is to creat the awareness for women to understand that the other woman sees her, her marriage and her man just as she sees hers also and to stop external discussion of relationship conflicts, better they are settled at home or by a psychologist. Otherwise the relationships can hit the block because of this attitude.

Depending on how superstitious you are, very often not to put a bad eye on someone you say bad things about them. You don’t brag you don’t commend. You tear down. In this way, you protect from the evil eye.

Yes, i agree that President Rodrigo Duterte is much responsible for his actions than the past corruptive administration who did nothing for the growth, development, employment in our country.

If not Duterte the president of the Philippines will have all the people converted to drug users/ traffickers and even digs might forcibly take drugs.There are million addicts on Ph. Celebrities are predicted 50 might take drugs, my goodness. This the figure assumption from the PDEA.There are so many bad images that are happening now through few senators. RIP to Senator Meriam Defensor Santiago. The country has lost a dedicated lady senator.

Everyone of them has the motive of expressing that misinterpreted word, “sorry”. It is easy to say sorry, but it is difficult to amend it especially when it involves the security and the life of a person. The worst is the mistake made by President Duterte. Why? If that certain public official is being liquidated for the gross mistake, could his life be restored? In the case, of President Aquino, he didn’t say anything for he has the reason. By so doing it, he is like admitting that the security of the foreigners in the country couldn’t be protected. It’s better to keep quite than to commit mistake or being misinterpreted. In the case of President Arroyo, it is different, very different.

Of all the three, in my opinion, it is Mr. Duterte who is more interested in the welfare and health of his people. He is taking hard action against those who are more responsible in spoiling the bright future of the youth on whom the foundation of the country lies. Even if he does not say sorry it will be acceptable to the people who are really interested in the welfare and development of their country. How the Governor got the list of names, is the question. Did he visited each and every house and inquired about the people? If not, how can he come out with a list of names showing them in a matrix.? This is what actually happens when one is taking and toiling for the development of the country. Generally, in such situations people who are the powerful approach the Governor and got their names included in the list. When the President is making such a hard work why the persons like Governor should meddle in the affairs and spoil the situation which is coming into the right track. Mr. Duterte should not care the Governor and should go ahead with the plan. Mr. Arrayo is already dubbed as inefficient. He never cared for the people and never took any action against the pusher. Better we do not talk about him. Mr. Aquino never said sorry. The security of foreign nationals was at stake means that he too failed miserably in arresting corruption. No need to talk about this man. His not saying sorry does not make him a great man.

Everyone is deserved to bear the fruits of our honest labor. We should be grateful with this kind of people to work for us with so much passion and dedication they never even tired of working for the best that they can be.

That is life… for no work, no money,for no money so hard to buy our daily needs. Our daily needs are very vital.Love flies in the window the old folks said of stomach is empty, hahahaaha.

Everyone who works in public service is legible for being paud their servi e money after servinv the government for years on end. I just don’t like it when people work for years and when the time comes for them to retire they are not paid their dividend that’s very bad
If a worker has worked diligently for more than 20 years they derse to be rewarded handsomely for their dedication, because it is not easy to sit in the same seat be in the and building seeing him same office setting every passing day for 20 years the leave there empty handed that’s inhuman.

In response to your closing question: Yes I believe it. Governments, i.e. the folks “in charge”, do some unimaginable things. History bears that out.

With respect to the title of your post, hope you don’t mind me contributing my “two cents”. The irony of terrorism is that the terrorists will not call themselves terrorists for what they do to others, but if others did the same things to them, they would say it was an act of terrorism. Everybody is right in their own eyes. But God is able to judge. So for those who are not on either side? “Heavenly Father, deliver us from evil.”

I can. It suits a Gov. to have an ‘enemy’ so that everything it does, no matter how repressive is right.

Not only governments, all those countries who lecture other nations about war, terrorism and human rights are biggest producers and sellers of weapons and arms. The arms industry is worth billions of dollars and I have no doubt in my mind that they fund terrorism and supply weapons to both sides (government and rebels) so that their economy flourishes.

You want to know another irony, those who manufacture and export weapons are highly developed countries. The countries with import weapons are extremely poor with no fund for basic infrastructure, health, education etc. for their people.

This is not a surprise to know that the Government stocks are being sold to the Terrorists by the Government officials. This is the meanest act on the part of Government . This is a cowardly act. The highly developed countries in their fight for Global supremacy have taken some wrong step somewhere at some time and are unable to take it back. This is the outcome of that wrong decision and step which the other countries are experiencing now. Do you believe? if I say that it was Md. Taraqui of Afghanistan who approached the USSR for help in their fight against Iran ? It is still continuing now.

Terrorism has been a pain in everyone’s heart all over the world, and no one seems to know who is behind it. It’s very unfortunate to know that it is not people from other countries who start terrorism in countries there is always someone behind the whole thing in that very country or government the terrorism is happening. We have heard so many stories about it and how it’s is formed and the best conclusion that comes out is nothing far from the truth that someone superior or some tycoon is the one aiding or supplying the arms to perform this acts. In Africa it’s said that this terrorists go through certain countries and use some locals to be able to get to th places that they need to go to and in turn give out some hefty payments to be let free. And in this life money has suddenly become a livelihood for many so people would give anything in exchange for money very sad indeed.

There are instances when terror outfits have used weapons earlier supplied by Governments and forces on the very forces later which supplied the weapons.

I have said many time that those who change their leader keeping in mind some betterment for the public a day dream because the new will come worst than the former as has happened in Philippe.

The most common definition of a “leadership problem” is a “leader problem”—a problem stemming from the person or people in charge, such as managers, chairpersons, or team leaders. Are they not doing their jobs? How can they improve their effectiveness?

Do they need to be replaced? It is reasonable to examine what the individuals with formal authority in the group are or are not doing that is contributing to the group not achieving results. However, the quick leap from “leadership problem” to “leader problem” can create tunnel vision.