@bestwriter Wikimedia was one of my favourite sources, some years ago. I still use them occasionally. I can see why you’d prefer them 🙂

@sunil Pixabay is a provider of public domain (and therefore free to use) images. It is not generally described as royalty-free because of the confusion with pay to use sites like Shutterstock. Pixabay’s…[Read more]

@bestwriter A royalty is a payment that is made to an artist (an actor, musician, writer, photographer, etc.) when that artist’s work is used in a commercial project that earns money. It’s kind of like a sales commission, but instead of being based on the sale of a product or service, it is paid for the permission to use a copyrighted work. When…[Read more]

@nakitakona13 Awesomesauce! Congratulations on an excellent title! You have a great balance, good length, and the title really gives the reader an idea what your post will be about. That’s exactly what you’re after 🙂

For fun, I put your headline into an analyzer that looks at emotion. You rated a super high 66.67%! On that analyzer they say the…[Read more]

@bestwriter To my knowledge, none of the Shutterstock images are free. There may, however, be some sort of free trial period when you sign up for the service. Any photo that appears on another site (like Pixabay) should be understood to be part of an ad for their paid service.

Regardless of your approach to writing or your goal in belonging to a…[Read more]

@Thinker Sorry, I’m no help when it comes to the nuances of American politics. I’m Canadian!

BTW, those who think Clinton and Trump (both terrible choices for president, IMHO) are the only options should give serious consideration to how Sanders differs from both. Whether or not people like his approach, he could teach many countries a thing or…[Read more]