bestwriter
@bestwriter active 1 year, 4 months agoForum Replies Created
Author | Posts |
I was not writing here for months. I did that last month and redeemed. But no payment.
|
|
Send a message to @supporot mentioning the url of your blog and request for editing it. We cannot do it but they can.Good luck. |
|
@cely I have looked at your work and amazing that you have not reached payout of 10 dollars. Each blog of yours runs into thousands of words. I thought you would get atleast half a dollar for each of those. I may be wrong. |
|
There is never a day when my fridge is without chocolates. |
|
Thank you for your prompt response. I certainly know the rules here and I am following them but I will not check to see if others are following those innumerous rules that you have listed. I may report for spam scam and plagiarism but nothing beyond that. That is for the site to do. I am certainly concerned about earning on comments I make on blogs which you will be deducting if you reject any blogs. Where I was not bothered about earnings was when I share a blog if any. That blog if written say on the first of a month will be there till you reject it at the end of the month. In other words we are floating blogs on the Net which are violations. This is bad for you. I feel frustrated that I am not able to convince you that rejecting blogs after they are there on the Net for the world to see is not a professional approach. Updating our bank and then deducting when members think they have reached payout is again to my mind not right.
|
|
I hunger for putting up images as I am a photographer and that having said why does the site allow putting a potato salad image on a political blog? (lol) |
|
@support There is another issue and that is quality. While the community can report those blogs that are plagiarised what is a quality blog only the site can say. I therefore feel all is not ok with this revised system. |
|
@support 1 Does it mean you expect those who wish to comment on blogs that they first check if the blog is a violation? 2, A blog is shared the moment it appears in the dashboard but Admin will check for its veracity much much later. In the meantime those blogs will be read by others. How do you justify this. It is not about earning while sharing but making others read what is a violation. 3. What happens when the blogger reaches 10 dollars in the bank and then stops blogging but realises there are rejections much later when it is placed for redemption. Is this a professional way to handle this? 4. Could we have an example of what is not a quality blog and which you have rejected here?
I still feel that you should consider placing the blogs in our dashboard only after they have been approved by your tech. people
Thanks.
|
|
@support There is yet another issue. When blogs appear in the blogs section users comment on them and earn something. What will happen to those earning if the blogs are rejected at the time of redemption ? |
|
@support I fully appreciate your efforts to clean the site and it should be done at all costs. But putting the blogs on our dashboard and also updating our bank and then rejecting is what I do not approve of. Once they come on our dashboards we share them. Is that the right thing to do specially those blogs that you will eventually reject? Once the bank reaches 10 dollars users stop posting. And if the amount is reduced when redemption is applied for the blogger will not be paid in that m0nth.
My suggestion is that you should go back to your old method BUT FINISH THE APPROVAL OR REJECTIONS WITHIN 3 DAYS OF SUBMISSION. |
|
@support Also, what about sharing posts once they come to the dashboard and then they are rejected? |
|
@support I fully appreciate your vigilance but my only request is that it is done before our blogs come to the dashboard. Earlier you did that but you took too long for approval. If you can approve our blogs say within 3 days then we could write further posts – earlier the better.
I have not been posting of late and I have no personal issues per se, but merely want to emphasise the need to approve our blogs before they come to the dashboard. Even updating our bank and then deducting could be quite demoralising.
Thank you for your prompt response. |
|
Admin should check for quality or whatever before they update the bank and put the blogs in the dashboard and reject only after redemption. This is wrong. Many will leave. Making bloggers blog by the sweat of their brow only to be rejected at payment time is not correct. If they are not happy with the quality blogs should be rejected before they find a place in the dashboard. |
|
There are few things the blogger already knows are violations 1. Less than 300 words 2. short titles 3. plagiarised text and images. And as for quality that lies with the site and they should pointit out before placing the blogs in the dashboard.
1 |
|
I highly disapprove of Admin’s method of first giving the go ahead signal by placing blogs in the dashboard, update the bank and then at the time of redemption decide to reject those that do not meet with their requirements. The blogs should be checked for violations before letting the blogger writes further posts. Blog should be rejected or approved right at the beginning within a stipulated time – may be witing 3 days after which the blogger should be paid for the blog even if the blog does not meet with the approval. @support should understand that this system that they are currently following will stop bloggers from posting here
|