-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Twitter, Wikipedia, free e-books, podcasts – all excellent ideas for the promotion of a business! I wasn’t aware that there’s a wizard for creating the Wikipedia pages. I’ll have to take a look at it sometime.
I like that you advise the reader not to make false claims or to inflate the truth when writing for a business page on Wikipedia. The site and the community that run Wikipedia insist that all claims be backed up with a reference. Many articles are flagged because they seem to be first-person accounts, to reflect unpublished personal research, or to be too promotional in tone. Many, many more Wikipedia articles will have minor flags because a member of the community has noted a claim is made without the appropriate reference citation.
I suspect that it’s better to add a stub to Wikipedia in order to represent one’s brand or business, with just the most basic information that can be sourced from the company web site. Once that page exists, others can add to it as new information can be sourced. This will tend to add to the reputation of both the Wikipedia page and the brand.
I do have to wonder whether the connection of the brand to a Wikipedia page – or even of the company owner to other reputable articles on Wikipedia – might help to boost the clout of the brand? I would think it could work in much the same way that backlinks from reputable web sites can help to convince Google of the authority with which an individual or a company writes.
I don’t have a lot of experience with having a page for one’s brand or company on Google+. At the moment, I’m still not sure how I feel about the so-called “circles” they use to organize people we follow on the site. It doesn’t seem as if it adds much to one’s experience, or helps much to give content a better reach. I am similarly unsure how I feel about the “collections.” They seem, if anything, to reduce the reach of content. That may be intended to supply a more targeted audience, but I’m not convinced enough people are using the feature appropriately. Unless it becomes widespread, it’s not likely to do much to help….
-
Thank You for this informative ideas. I never knew one can create a page in wikipedia and promote sales through it. I will give it a trial. This is a well creative information. Thank you once again for posting.
-
Nice and effective guide to business local and international. My friend became richer with her on line business done in twitter and Facebook.She has big capital as having a very rich foreigner husband.
-
-
-
It’s unfortunate that, as companies move towards a preference for a work-from-home setup for such services as quality control and transcription, they also tend to pay significantly less money than they would if they were hiring an employee in their own locale.
While many legitimate work-from-home opportunities exist, and they do pay significantly better than pay-per-click, surveys and other online earning opportunities, that same work would pay a living wage if the worker were engaged through the usual hiring process.
I’m happy that these opportunities do exist, but I really wish that governments would set some kind of minimums to prevent people being used as slave labour. The excuse that the work is non-remunerated and that the worker just receives a “performance bonus” is pretty transparent. we all know that some companies could pay much more, and just don’t want to.
-
Actually, work at home is a lucrative job that does not only give you convenience but also grant you the opportunity to do other things at will. It has been in existence for years now but one can still find it difficult to detect the genuine ones that will really pay when a certain job is completed. I plead your indulgence to please enlist some genuine work at home site that you trusted in your next post. Thanks so much for posting!
-
I been writing articles for almost 7 years now, and I experienced vast happiness everything salary is sent to my pay pal.It also helps incur other expenses at home. This time thousands are working on line as full time or as part time only, like me.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Load More