Nice post, you did research on this.

@Mike This blog would be useful for Web designers for suppliers. Hope it will get many views.

You sure sounds like my economic professor.
he keeps on talking about elasticity, and most of us are sleeping through his lessons.

Economics is one of my favorite subjects when I was studying in college. This is one of my subjects in my commerce course, especially the freshmen. I remember that we had the thorough discussions about wants and needs, commodities, entrepreneurship, among others.

I also remember the types of commodities the producers or the entrepreneurs to offer. So they could be seen or tangible and they couldn’t be seen or intangible. Thus, we come out the definition of economics is a science of providing the people of their wants and needs according to their demands.

Wants may be important or not. But needs are necessities. For without them, the consumers or the people may not live or exist. So they may be referred to foods, medicines, among others.

3.84 is the criteria for F value to test which hypothesis is accepted. This is a globally verified criteria and this is how it is.

3.84 is the criteria for F value to test which hypothesis is accepted. This is a globally verified criteria and this is how it is.

Sound deep to me.
What is this method used for? I doubt the banks use it to analyze products or sales.

hmm nice

Sounds like a very complicated formula to understand. I tried but did not fully understand the model. I hope this works for you.

Great and detailed technical overview.

Great. Thanks

wow that is great work and well written articles thanks for the details

Pardon me for I find it too dark to understand what you are talking about Granger causality test eviews. I know you are presenting some steps on how to follow and get the results. But what we need is the background of this eviews. Where is the appropriate application or use of this test?

Is this about a mathematics? Physics? Or whatever? I noticed that most of those who have left their comments are in big quandary, in a state of confusion. What we are actually expecting is something that we could put our opinion for that subject that we have known, for the facts that we could infer their applicability.

I wonder why that the admin has approved this kind of post which most of us here couldn’t benefit. I am not saying that it would be recalled. In a simplest term, we need a background to where this is being applied. If there is, sorry if I missed it.

I love it when I read something and actually learn something. Greatly informative, thank you for posting.

What is casuality, you can be a causality of something which you don’t expect, there is accidental causality, fire causality, water both misharp causality, and so many other things you can mention,

I guess if I was a computer expert I would understand this, but I had to look just out of curiousity. Is this the same if you are working on a Linux based system? Why anyway, would I need to do it? I am curious and sure this has relevance somehow.