Author Posts

March 4, 2017 at 12:52 am

In ancient India Nandas are considered the bad emperors. What is the main reason behind it.Are they cruel?Are they against anyone.?Then what was such thing that they were considered a bad emperors? According to me which has been written in history books that they were great and powerful Kingdom his time.They were so strong that great Alexander ‘army rejected to fight with them.This one thing is sufficient to prove that how powerful were they.Second thing why they were considered as bad kings.I think supporting buddhism and opposing brahmana was main reason was about that. Later brahmana scholars proved him a  bad  kings.