Author | Posts |
I know you all have your own spelling checker. How about giving this a try?
“SPELL CZECH Eye halve a spelling chequer. It came with my pea sea.It plainly marques four my revue miss steaks eye kin knot sea.Eye strike a key and type a word and weight four it two sayWeather eye am wrong oar write. It shows me strait a weigh.As soon as a mist ache is maid, it nose bee fore two longAnd eye can put the error rite. Its rarely ever wrong.Eye have run this poem threw it. I am shore your pleased two no.Its letter perfect in its weigh. My cheque tolled me sew Sauce unknown” Have fun!!!
| |
It should be: I have a spelling checker. It came with my PC. It plainly marks four of my review mistakes which I did not see. I strike a key and type a word and waited for it to say whether I am wrong or right. It shows me straight away. As soon as a mistake is made, it knows before too long and I can put the error right. It is rarely ever wrong. I have run this poem through it. I am sure that you are pleased to know. Its letter perfect its weight. My checks told me so. Source unknown.
What a horrible piece of article with 90% of mistakes!
Anyway, finally done, without using any spelling checker !
| |
@peachpurple – That was a fun post. | |
@peachpurple, hehehe so funny post. I like it. | |
@peachpurple – you’re good at it. I had a hard time decoding the whole paragraph. @bestwriter – I had fun reading your post. | |
@Rachz Glad you had fun. It was not meant for correcting it but I appreciate @peachpurple‘s efforts. | |
Oh I thought that I was required to check the spelling mistakes! Yup, it was a fun post. Thanks | |
I am not using a spell checker or do a spell check with my article. I am used to writing it simple so that I could right away detect my mistakes, my grammar error or whatever that it makes it senseless or nonsensical. It is my motto in writing to write is to choose and to write it simply. In so doing, my thoughts won’t get tipsy-turvy. My sentences are written with coherence. My paragraph has its own thought for that matter. | |
Great example of why a human proofreader is always needed! Thanks for the comic relief, Grace 😀 | |
@nakitakona13 Then how about using this one? (lol) | |
I think Microsoft Word is fine with me. It checks the spelling of English words I had written in my composition. But then, I usually proofread my write ups. | |
Actually the paragraph you have posted here as an example doesn’t necessary need a spell check for the words written are already included or found in the built-in dictionary in MS or any word processor like OpenOffice, and the like. What actually it needs is a grammar check. It doesn’t only correct the wrong spelling, but also the predictive words or phrases found in the said word processor. The words like the eye, pea, sea, marques, revue, steaks, kin, weight, four, two, say, weather, oar, write, strait, weigh, mist, ache, maid, and many more are correct but they are used in the wrong context. | |
@nakitakona13 This was a fun post. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.