@Christi Espinola I have redeemed several times and got paid every time. Don’t worry the site is legit and pays before 15th of every month in your PayPal account.

There is never a day when my fridge is without chocolates.

I have searched the story that you have related and on most websites it has been termed a hoax, such as Snopes.com. However I fully respect your passion and love for your religion.

Being a Muslim, I will only answer your question: Do Muslims believe in Jesus Christ?

The simple answer is Yes we do.

We cannot be Muslims unless we believe that…[Read more]

Thank you for your prompt response.

I certainly know the rules here and I am following them but I will not check to see if others are following those innumerous rules that you have listed.  I may report for spam  scam and plagiarism but nothing beyond that.  That is for the site to do.

I am certainly  concerned about earning on comments I mak…[Read more]

I hunger for putting up images as I am a photographer and that having said why does the site allow putting a potato salad image on a political blog?  (lol)

@support There is another issue and that is quality. While the community can report those blogs that are plagiarised what is a quality blog only the site can say.  I therefore feel all is not ok with this revised system.

@support     1 Does it mean you expect those who wish to comment on blogs that they first check if the blog is a violation?

2, A blog is shared the moment it appears in the dashboard but Admin will check for its veracity much much later.  In the meantime those blogs will be read by others.  How do you justify this. It is not about earning whi…[Read more]

@support  There is yet another issue.  When blogs appear in the blogs section users comment on them and earn something.  What will happen to those earning if the blogs are rejected at the time of redemption ?

@support  I fully appreciate your efforts to clean the site and it should be done at all costs. But putting the blogs on our dashboard and also updating our bank and then rejecting is what I do not approve of.  Once they come on our dashboards we share them. Is that the right thing to do specially those blogs that you will eventually reject?  …[Read more]

@support Also, what about sharing posts once they come to the dashboard and then they are rejected?

@support I fully appreciate your vigilance but my only request is that it is done before our blogs come to the dashboard.  Earlier you did that but you took too long for approval.  If you can approve our blogs say within 3 days then we could write further posts – earlier the better.

I have not been posting of late and I have no personal i…[Read more]

Admin should check for quality or whatever before they update the bank and put the blogs in the dashboard and reject only after redemption.  This is wrong.  Many will leave. Making bloggers blog by the sweat of their brow only to be rejected at payment time is not correct. If they are not happy with the  quality  blogs should be rejected bef…[Read more]

There are few things the blogger already knows are violations

1. Less than 300 words

2. short titles

3. plagiarised text and images.

And as for quality that lies with the site and they should pointit out before placing the blogs in the dashboard.

1

I highly disapprove of Admin’s method of first giving  the go ahead signal by placing  blogs in the dashboard, update the bank and then at the time of redemption decide to reject those that do not meet with their requirements.  The blogs should be checked for violations before letting the blogger writes further posts.

Blog should be rejected or…[Read more]